You are currently browsing the Rant-atouille weblog archives for the day 25. September 2007.
- Blogroll (1)
- Freedom (13)
- Gay (6)
- International (4)
- Leadership (2)
- Personal (3)
- Politics (13)
- Race (1)
- Religion (3)
- Uncategorized (2)
- Your Rights (7)
- 11. February 2011: The Future's so Bright, I have to Wear Shades
- 27. December 2010: Official Asshole
- 24. December 2010: The Beginning of an Era
- 3. November 2010: The End of This Year's Political Firestorm
- 20. October 2010: The Political Nightmare Continues
- 6. October 2010: There is Hope
- 4. July 2010: Happy Independence Day - 2010
- 25. June 2010: Glenn Beck is a moron
- 26. May 2010: And everything changes...maybe
- 9. April 2010: R.I.P. Oh Teacher
Archive for 25. September 2007
Everyone is wrong about him
25. September 2007 by Rob.
The “him” I refer to is Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. And the stories over the past few days have come fast and furious. From the initial outcry over Columbia University’s hosting him to the comments he made at the United Nations, Americans really haven’t followed the true meaning behind these events.
The fact is that his participation in the event at Columbia University was necessary to prove the true power of democracy. I was astounded and gratefully amazed at the University President’s comments which challenged President Ahmadinejad views. And Ahmadinejad’s reaction and subsequent fall was the most perfect example of why this effort had significant value. The derision he was met with when he stated that there were no gays in Iran is not something he is used to. But he, and the world, need to see that true democracy allows idiots to spout their lies and fallacies but to also be challenged for them. He couldn’t defend his views and so he lost, a true victory.
Unfortunately, those people who protested his appearance, while they have the full right to do so, obviously didn’t get it. They didn’t want him to have the right to speak his piece in a forum where people could choose to be…or not. If he had been barred from participating, then, remarkably enough, his views would have been validated because we would not be living in a democracy. If the protesters had been there to challenge his views, then I feel they would have been valid. But to seek to deny him the opportunity to speak? I suggest you read the Constitution of the United States again. And thank your lucky stars that we have not (yet) fallen from that ideal.
Posted in Your Rights, Freedom, International, Politics | No Comments »